EssayShark is an online essay writing service that provides research papers and other academic writing assistance to students. While research papers composed by writers employed by such companies raise ethical issues, analyzing EssayShark’s research papers can provide insight into the quality of work produced.
When students turn to services like EssayShark to complete research papers, it is important they understand the limitations of the work produced. While writers aim to meet assignment requirements, the end result may lack the depth, analysis, and thoughtfulness of an original student-authored paper. For students facing time constraints or other challenges, outsourcing research can seem like the only option to complete degree requirements.
Research papers ordered through EssayShark are original compositions tailored to the client’s assigned topic and instructions. Writers have graduate degrees in various subjects and are native English speakers. When placing an order, clients provide topic details, word count or page length requirements, academic level, citation style, and deadline. Payments are processed securely through a third party to protect clients’ financial information.
The quality of EssayShark research papers depends on various factors such as the writer assigned, topic complexity, available research materials, and time allotted for completion. To gain insight, published ExampleEssays are examined along with client reviews and ethical concerns explored. On the positive side, writers demonstrate subject knowledge and papers typically meet basic assignment criteria. Depth of analysis, argument development, and original contribution are often limited.
Example Essays examined spanned topics in various academic disciplines at both undergraduate and graduate levels. Papers followed standard research paper structure with introduction, thesis statement, body paragraphs developing points, and conclusion summarizing key takeaways. Sources were properly cited using styles like APA and MLA. Overall formatting adhered to standard paper layout guidelines. Length generally met or exceeded the 2,000-3,000 word range typical for college assignments.
Grammar, spelling, and punctuation appeared error-free, demonstrating strong English proficiency. Vocabulary and sentence structure variety showed writing skill. Upon closer reading, some limitations become apparent. While topics were research- oriented, depth of analysis and argument development fell short compared to standards expected of original student work. Discussions relied heavily on summarizing sources rather than synthesizing multiple perspectives or posing insightful new assertions. Conclusions often simply restated introduction points rather than exploring broader implications.
Reviews from EssayShark clients suggest mixed results. Positive feedback highlighted on-time delivery, adherence to instructions, subject knowledge, and error-free writing. Others critiqued lack of analysis or argued certain papers felt more like patched together source summaries lacking a cohesive argument or voice. Topics with ample research materials seemed to yield stronger quality versus highly specialized subjects. Tight deadlines also impacted depth researchers could achieve. Overall, clients report the level of work meets basic grading criteria but may not wow demanding professors.
From an ethical perspective, the plagiarism-free guarantee and use of qualified professional writers helps address academic integrity concerns compared to lower-quality essay mills. Customers effectively outsource their scholarly responsibilities, circumventing the learning objectives of research assignments to develop skills like time management, synthesis of complex topics, and original argument formulation. While meeting immediate demands, outsourcing may hinder long-term academic and career preparation. It also raises questions around the integrity of degrees/qualifications earned with substantial reliance on contract writing services.
While EssayShark research papers exhibit professional standards in formatting, structure and free of technical writing errors, the analytical depth and substantive contribution expected of genuine student work are often lacking. Tight deadlines, specialized topics and variable writer skillsets impact consistency. While meeting basic requirements to alleviate time-crunched students, dependence on such services risks compromising learning objectives and scholarly integrity. Overall quality provides a passable paper for some assessed criteria but may not earn highest marks from discerning professors favoring original critical thought. Further constraints include topic limitations based on available research and writer expertise within allotted timeframes.