Introduction:
The “essay type discuss” is a format of academic writing that requires students to analyze different perspectives on a topic, weigh up arguments, and come to a reasoned conclusion of their own. It is a common assessment type seen in humanities and social science subjects across high school and university levels. Despite its prevalence, some students struggle with understanding what is required in this style of essay. This discussion will analyze the key elements and structure of a strong “discuss” essay, provide examples, and offer tips for success.
Understanding the Question:
The first and most important step is to thoroughly understand the essay question. It is crucial to identify the key terms or topics to be discussed, any limitations or boundaries set, and determine what type of response is being assessed – an analysis of arguments, a balanced evaluation, or a reasoned judgment. Circling and highlighting important parts of the question helps focus the scope. Identifying the standpoint or viewpoints implied can provide a starting point for structuring the discussion.
Developing a Thesis:
A clear, compelling thesis statement is vital to provide direction and coherence. An effective thesis makes a claim about the issue rather than just introducing the topic. It should present the overall position or conclusion to be argued and foreshadow the main points of discussion without being too specific or repetitive of the question. The thesis may take a definite stance while acknowledging other views, or it could introduce a balanced position for evaluation. Well-developed evidence and reasoning from the essay must logically relate back to and support the central thesis.
Incorporating Relevant Perspectives:
The “discuss” format requires analysis of different angles on the topic. Reliable, credible sources should be used to present the key perspectives and their major arguments or interpretations of available evidence. Direct quotations are rarely needed, but paraphrasing the essence of positions concisely and accurately is important. The perspectives discussed should be meaningful to answering the question rather than exhaustive. Balancing coverage of opposing views without favoring one prematurely is advised. Providing context and qualifications for the viewpoints demonstrates impartial understanding.
Weighing Up the Arguments:
This is the analytical core where various perspectives are evaluated and compared regarding their relative strengths and weaknesses. Key points of each are scrutinized systematically and logically with support from examples, facts, empirical data or authoritative sources. Counterarguments can be addressed or pre-empted. Unpacking underlying assumptions exposes vulnerabilities. Connecting back to the thesis focusses the discussion. Distinguishing solid arguments from weak ones shows balanced critical thinking rather than subjective bias. Alternative explanations and interpretations demonstrate open-minded consideration of complexities.
Developing a Conclusion:
Summarizing the major points without repetition allows a well-reasoned final judgment on the issue in light of the discussion. The conclusion need not simply reiterate earlier positions but can introduce a refined outcome informed by scrutinizing multiple perspectives. It should logically flow from the discussion and definitively answer the original question given the evidence and analysis presented. Where an unambiguous conclusion is not possible, areas requiring further examination can be acknowledged. Re-stating the relevance and significance of the resolved issue provides closure.
Structuring the Essay:
A clear structure enhances coherence and signposts the logical flow of arguments for assessors. An introduction outlining the issue, perspectives and thesis is followed by Body paragraphs each dedicated to one perspective or argument including analysis and comparisons to others. A conclusion paragraph should tie all perspectives together and make an informed resolution to the debate. Paragraph transitions, links between ideas and a consistent writing style across the essay unify discrete sections. Adhering to assessment guidelines regarding word count is also important. Overall, strong organization facilitates a reader’s understanding.
Tips for Success:
Choose a focused issue allowing scope for discussion rather than generalization
Conduct thorough background research from valid sources on all relevant angles
Develop and adhere to an outline to stay on track
Use point-form notes on key arguments to craft analysis
Compare, evaluate and make linkages between perspectives
Weigh evidence objectively without bias by critically questioning all views
Express well-reasoned judgments with definitive conclusions where possible
Proofread for logical flow, cohesion, grammar and referenced corrections
Conclusion:
Mastering the “discuss” format requires understanding the demands of the task, incorporating multiple perspectives, weighing arguments objectively and arriving at a well-supported resolution through clear organization and effective expression. With practice analyzing issues, critically assessing different views and constructing coherent, balanced discussions, students can demonstrate the higher-order thinking skills assessed in this essay type. Adhering to the provided framework should result in a high-quality response meeting the criteria of the question.
Andrew Stroud