Introduction:
Writing task 2 is one of the most important sections of IELTS exam as it’s focused on testing candidate’s ability to develop an argument and present their views coherently on a given topic. While there are many sample essay questions available online, analyzing pre-written model essays is the best way to understand the structure, language and approach expected in task 2 writing. This essay will provide a detailed analysis of three IELTS task 2 sample essays to understand the key elements that make a good essay and achieve a high band score.
Sample Essay 1:
Some people believe that technological advances will result in more free time, while others argue that technology is creating a 24/7 work culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
This essay begins by clearly outlining the two views in the question – that technology can result in more free time or create a 24/7 work culture. It then proceeds to discuss both views in separate paragraphs using examples and evidence.
The first body paragraph focuses on the view that technology leads to more free time. It cites examples like labor-saving devices reducing time spent on chores, video conferencing replacing business travel, and the potential of smart homes automating daily tasks. It also acknowledges the limitations of current technologies and that not all work can be replaced.
The second body paragraph argues the counter view that technology enables a 24/7 work culture. It provides examples of people always being connected through mobile devices, the blurring lines between work and personal life, and employers expecting a quick response around the clock. Relevant statistics are included to support arguments, like the percentage of employees regularly checking emails after work hours.
In the conclusion, the writer weighs both views objectively before giving their own opinion that while technology currently enables overtime work, future advances may allow a better work-life balance if used judiciously. Overall cohesion is maintained through the use of linking words and a balanced consideration of arguments on either side of the issue.
Sample Essay 2:
Some people think students should specialize in one subject area from an early age, while others believe a more general education is preferable. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
This essay provides a clear overview of the contrasting views in the introduction before expanding on each in a separate body paragraph.
The first body paragraph discusses the argument for early specialization, stating that focusing on one subject intensively from a young age allows students to gain expertise and possibly pursue advanced levels. It acknowledges potential benefits like career focus and competitive advantage but notes disadvantages like limiting overall knowledge and potential career changes.
The second body paragraph presents the counter viewpoint that a general education exposes students to diverse subjects before specialization. It argues this helps students discover aptitudes and makes informed career choices, citing examples of careers drawing from multiple disciplines. It also points out the challenge of mastering multiple subjects in depth.
In the conclusion, the writer weighs the pros and cons of both approaches objectively before stating their opinion that a balanced education combining specialization with breadth is preferable. Transitional phrases are used to link the introduction to body paragraphs and between arguments, demonstrating coherence.
Overall Band Score: This response clearly addresses all parts of the task. Both sides of the issue are discussed in detail using relevant examples, arguments are logically progressed and a clear stance is stated at the end along with justification. Coherence is maintained through connecting words and balanced consideration of views. With excellent grammatical range and accuracy, this essay would likely score in the band of 8 or above.
Sample Essay 3:
Governments should give higher priority to space exploration programs instead of spending on other priorities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
After restating the issue, this essay clearly states agreement in the introduction itself before supporting this stance across two body paragraphs.
The first body paragraph argues that the scientific discoveries and technological advancements from space programs boost overall prosperity and quality of life through applications in various fields. It cites examples like satellite communications, weather monitoring, and medical innovations developed from space research. It does acknowledge the very high financial costs involved.
The second body paragraph discusses broader economic and strategic benefits of space programs in developing skilled human resources, high-tech industries, and inspiration to students. It argues this drives innovation and global competitiveness. Statistics are provided showing returns exceeding costs for NASA programs through new technologies and sectors created.
In the conclusion, the writer acknowledges that some initial investment is demanded but space programs have immense long term payoffs justifying priority over other spending areas in many cases. While alternative views are not directly discussed, coherence is maintained through signposting opinions and qualified language. Overall structure and cohesion are good.
Band Score: Though views opposing higher priority for space programs over other issues are not directly addressed, relevant and compelling reasons are provided to support the stance with examples, facts and figures. Sufficient details are given for a high-level discussion of the complex issue. Topic sentences, logical organization and transitional markers aid cohesion. Excellent vocabulary and grammatical control indicate a band score of 7 or higher.
Conclusion: Analyzing different IELTS task 2 sample responses helps identify the elements of a good essay including clear structure with introduction-body-conclusion format, balanced discussion of views, relevant examples, logistical arguments, statistics or facts for support, use of signposting language and maintaining coherence. While sample answers serve as models, candidates should aim to develop personalized responses based on their own analytical abilities, skills, experiences and opinions. Overall, understanding what examiners look for in writing is key to achieving higher scores.
Andrew Stroud